Metal Roof Replacement in Morgan's Point from $9. The obvious coastal answer, and the one with the most ways to get it wrong. Free inspection and a written quote.
The most exposed position in the service area is the strongest case for standing seam anywhere on this site. Clip spacing specified for the actual wind load rather than by habit, and the eaves, rake and ridge details drawn rather than assumed.
Metal is a reasonable choice this close to open water: it handles wind well when it is fixed well, it sheds the rain this coast delivers in volume, and it lasts considerably longer than asphalt. It also costs substantially more up front, which is the honest trade.



Metal runs roughly $9 to $18 per square foot installed depending on system, with exposed-fastener panel at the bottom and standing seam at the top. It is a real premium over asphalt, bought with a much longer life and, on this coast, better wind behavior when it is fixed properly. The most exposed roofs on this site, and priced as such: fixings and edge detail take precedence over product choice, and standing seam is worth pricing alongside asphalt here more than anywhere else in the service area.
Exposed-fastener panel on a simple roof. It is the cheapest metal there is and it performs acceptably inland -- with the caveat that the screws and washers are consumables and want checking every few years.
Standing seam, and complicated geometry. Concealed clips cost more and are the right answer close to the water; every hip, valley and junction on a complex roof is a fabricated detail rather than a cut panel.
Clip or fastener spacing for the actual wind load, and the eaves, rake and ridge details drawn. A metal roof fails at its fixings and its edges, not in the middle of a panel.
The single most exposed position in this service area: open water on two sides and nothing upwind. Uplift is the design case, fixings outrank product, and on the older substantial houses the roof shapes are complicated enough that every detail has to be thought about rather than repeated.
Another separate city with its own permitting, and the most wind-exposed roofs this site works on.
Worth knowing before you start ringing round, particularly after a blow.
Wind on this shore does not arrive politely spread across the year. It comes through in systems, and when one does, entire subdivisions lose edges in the same afternoon. That is when every crew between here and Houston is busy, and it is also when the most people knock on doors offering to start tomorrow.
Open water on two sides and nothing upwind makes this the most exposed position in the service area.
Shingle on a headland with open water on two sides is asking a lot of asphalt.
Exposed on two sides, so the perimeter fixing here is not a detail to be economized on under any circumstances.
150 mph, nails not staples, certified in 30 days.
1970s-90s streets under oaks, aging together.
Mixed-age stock, much of it older than the spec.
Nothing between these roofs and the bay.
More planes, more perimeter, more to fasten.
Its own city, exposed, and heavy oaks overhead.
Inland, west of 146, and the simplest roofs here.
Asked on every job of this kind. Answered here.
Standing seam uses concealed clips with nothing through the face of the panel, which is the right answer close to open water. Exposed fastener is cheaper and fine further inland, with the caveat that the screws and their washers are consumables -- they perish, faster in salt air, and they want checking every few years.
It can be, and the honest framing is cost per year of expected life rather than up-front price. What it is NOT is maintenance-free or automatically better in wind: a badly fixed metal roof fails at its fixings just as an under-nailed shingle roof fails at its edges.
Not on age alone -- but on this coast there is a second question that matters more. A 20 year old architectural roof is middle-aged by material standards, so the usual tests apply: granule loss, brittleness, how flat the covering lies, whether the deck is sound. Then ask how it was fastened. A roof fitted 20 years ago may have been stapled, or nailed to a pattern that predates the current wind requirement, and on a bay-shore house that matters more than how the shingles look.
It is a Florida rule and it has no force in Texas. The 25% rule comes from the Florida Building Code Existing Building, where repairing or replacing more than a quarter of a roof within a year can trigger a requirement to bring the whole roof up to current code. Texas has no equivalent provision, and La Porte's requirements are set out in its own roofing policy instead. Anyone quoting the 25% rule at you in Texas is citing the wrong state's code book.
In La Porte, yes -- a roof replacement needs a permit whether you are hiring somebody or doing it yourself. Texas has no statewide answer to this because permitting is municipal, which is why the question keeps getting answered badly online. Doing it yourself also does not exempt the roof from the specification: the 150 mph shingle requirement and the nails-not-staples rule apply to the roof, not to who fitted it, and the certification letter still has to reach the city inside 30 days.
Shingles specified to the 150 mph rating the city requires. Nails to the manufacturer's pattern, never staples.