Roof Replacement in Morgan's Point from $7,500. $10,500 to $14,000 on a typical Houston-area roof -- built to a 150 mph rating, nailed not stapled, and certified afterwards. Free inspection and a written quote.
Open water on two sides and nothing upwind makes this the most exposed position in the service area. On the older substantial houses here the roof shapes are complicated enough that every junction has to be thought about individually, and fixings matter more than any product decision.
Most Houston-area re-roofs run $7,500 to $16,500 in architectural asphalt, and a house with 2,000 to 2,500 square feet of roof area typically lands at $10,500 to $14,000. Per square foot that is $6.00 to $9.00 for architectural against $4.50 to $7.50 for three-tab.



Most Houston-area re-roofs run $7,500 to $16,500 in architectural asphalt, and a house with 2,000 to 2,500 square feet of roof area typically lands at $10,500 to $14,000. On the bay shore, add the specification: 150 mph shingles, nails rather than staples, and a certification letter within 30 days of the permit. The most exposed roofs on this site, and priced as such: fixings and edge detail take precedence over product choice, and standing seam is worth pricing alongside asphalt here more than anywhere else in the service area.
A simple roof shape with few planes, good access, one existing layer to come off, and a deck that turns out sound. The inland subdivisions tick most of those.
Perimeter. Every additional roof plane is another set of rakes, eaves and ridges to fasten properly, and on this coast the perimeter detail is not the place to economize. Exposure adds to it again down by the water.
How decking replacement is priced. It belongs in the scope as a rate per sheet, because nobody knows how much has softened until the covering is off.
A small separate city on the point where the bay meets the ship channel, one of the oldest settled spots on this shore and now surrounded by port industry.
A small and varied housing stock, some of it historic and substantial, on an exposed headland site.
The single most exposed position in this service area: open water on two sides and nothing upwind. Uplift is the design case, fixings outrank product, and on the older substantial houses the roof shapes are complicated enough that every detail has to be thought about rather than repeated.
Another separate city with its own permitting, and the most wind-exposed roofs this site works on.
Worth knowing before you start ringing round, particularly after a blow.
Wind on this shore does not arrive politely spread across the year. It comes through in systems, and when one does, entire subdivisions lose edges in the same afternoon. That is when every crew between here and Houston is busy, and it is also when the most people knock on doors offering to start tomorrow.
Shingle on a headland with open water on two sides is asking a lot of asphalt.
The most exposed position in the service area is the strongest case for standing seam anywhere on this site.
Exposed on two sides, so the perimeter fixing here is not a detail to be economized on under any circumstances.
150 mph, nails not staples, certified in 30 days.
1970s-90s streets under oaks, aging together.
Mixed-age stock, much of it older than the spec.
Nothing between these roofs and the bay.
More planes, more perimeter, more to fasten.
Its own city, exposed, and heavy oaks overhead.
Inland, west of 146, and the simplest roofs here.
Asked on every job of this kind. Answered here.
The permit is taken out before the work, and within 30 days of it issuing a completed certification letter has to reach the city, signed by a Texas licensed engineer or an ICC Certified Coastal Construction and Floodplain Inspector. Agree who is signing yours before anybody starts, because a roof that will not certify is a problem found a month late.
Only over one existing layer, on a sound deck -- and here there is an extra reason not to. An overlay buries the existing fastening, so if the roof underneath was stapled you now have a new covering fixed to a layer that is itself under-fixed. On a bay-shore roof that is the wrong saving.
Not on age alone -- but on this coast there is a second question that matters more. A 20 year old architectural roof is middle-aged by material standards, so the usual tests apply: granule loss, brittleness, how flat the covering lies, whether the deck is sound. Then ask how it was fastened. A roof fitted 20 years ago may have been stapled, or nailed to a pattern that predates the current wind requirement, and on a bay-shore house that matters more than how the shingles look.
It is a Florida rule and it has no force in Texas. The 25% rule comes from the Florida Building Code Existing Building, where repairing or replacing more than a quarter of a roof within a year can trigger a requirement to bring the whole roof up to current code. Texas has no equivalent provision, and La Porte's requirements are set out in its own roofing policy instead. Anyone quoting the 25% rule at you in Texas is citing the wrong state's code book.
In La Porte, yes -- a roof replacement needs a permit whether you are hiring somebody or doing it yourself. Texas has no statewide answer to this because permitting is municipal, which is why the question keeps getting answered badly online. Doing it yourself also does not exempt the roof from the specification: the 150 mph shingle requirement and the nails-not-staples rule apply to the roof, not to who fitted it, and the certification letter still has to reach the city inside 30 days.
Shingles specified to the 150 mph rating the city requires. Nails to the manufacturer's pattern, never staples.